tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31155409.post7998963649833399550..comments2015-09-17T07:41:44.110+10:00Comments on Real UFOs - The latest UFO videos and News from all over the world ufo video photos ovnis ufos ovni: Mars Curiosity Rover Sights Its First UFO: Object Ascends Near Light?realufosnoreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31155409.post-75597441954399419082012-08-28T19:47:29.388+10:002012-08-28T19:47:29.388+10:00NASA = Never A Straight Answer
I have seen UFO...NASA = Never A Straight Answer<br /><br />I have seen UFO's and am a firm believer! I still feel that NASA covers up a lot of the truth. Perhaps even all the truth?!<br /><br />As for a dust cloud?! I don't accept that one.... Come on NASA!!! We are all grownups here and human to boot! STOP feeding us lies!!! Your lies are thinner than the atmosphere of Mars!!!! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31155409.post-14996516488188068122012-08-22T00:39:11.996+10:002012-08-22T00:39:11.996+10:00Don't they have enough time to travel to the s...Don't they have enough time to travel to the so called pyramid sites any way. And if they were covering them up they wouldn't land near them cause that would mean they were interested. The old smoke and mirrors is so predictible. They could have been smarter and landed at these suspect sites and then dismissed them as natural formations. And why wouldn't you land where the last mission failed. Sheesh it's getting annoying Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31155409.post-40043394885788742462012-08-20T04:10:34.130+10:002012-08-20T04:10:34.130+10:00nasa why land in the middle of nowhere why not lan...nasa why land in the middle of nowhere why not land near the glass tubes trees or other places where there looks like buildings no you have to land where you did because you know whats on mars and its still this game your playing dust landing gear give us a break.<br />minusbeerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13041403023998482234noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31155409.post-75537544751798485342012-08-11T18:40:20.274+10:002012-08-11T18:40:20.274+10:00Come on people...
This is an obvious fake to try ...Come on people...<br /><br />This is an <b>obvious</b> fake to try and gain traffic to his blog site.<br /><br />This is simply the below navigation photo from the rover's rear hazcam with an overlay.<br /><br />These are photos, not videos.<br /><br />http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/ipbrowse/PIA15972_ip.jpg<br /><br /><a href="http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/ipbrowse/PIA15972_ip.jpg" rel="nofollow">Link to photo</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31155409.post-32988244857027569502012-08-11T17:50:03.996+10:002012-08-11T17:50:03.996+10:00This explanation is
The second object stays at sa...This explanation is <br />The second object stays at same altitude, so, can only be an orbiting object...<br />The first object can be a star or any object rising over the horizon vertically due to the perspective ( orbiting at 90° from the second one )<br /><br />This explanation prevail, if stars and satellites are visible during day light, if not, these are non conventional objects : UFOSAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31155409.post-8244964135898187062012-08-11T02:28:33.944+10:002012-08-11T02:28:33.944+10:00I know it may be VERY far fetched, but has NASA po...I know it may be VERY far fetched, but has NASA possibly gone to Mars to see the effects of Nibiru to study any effects on planetary systems?skahooch21http://www.blogger.com/profile/03169634592510021453noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31155409.post-10324250773564227692012-08-10T22:10:30.832+10:002012-08-10T22:10:30.832+10:00I didn't see it as asending from the ground,I ...I didn't see it as asending from the ground,I saw it as a white object on a trajectory on the horizon,from left to right!!<br /><br />I paused the video, & magnified it by 1000!...It looked no different<br />than you would see on a video, of an orb seen here on Earth,but yes,<br />no detail!!just a white light that could be anything, and yes! you can call it a UFO. but as a ufo. could it BE a satellite or meteor?<br />that is possible!?<br /><br />But as for NASA saying it could be the movement of a cloud of dust,in the background caused by the rover landing!! Who was the bright spark<br />to think that one up? the fastest<br />dust cloud I've ever seen!? A clearly round white dust cloud???<br />give us a brake nasa:)not a cloud!<br />or even part of the Rovers landing gear! come on, pull the other leg:)<br />but I could except a satellite or meteor, or at this point,a UFO....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31155409.post-15142214592755243142012-08-10T21:57:13.232+10:002012-08-10T21:57:13.232+10:00Funny how the pictures are of the ground. Can'...Funny how the pictures are of the ground. Can't tell if there is life by only looking at the ground! Look up. I am gettn the feeling like there is another cover up! Another year added where the gov thinks we are not prepared for what's out there.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com