Sunday, September 18, 2011

Strange Ufo like craft over San Antonio texas

Further Ufo reports from the 14th of September this time over San Antonio Texas.
With the volume of Ufo reports on the 14th coming in can we simply accept this as a meteorite? Surely something else is going on. Numerous people report seeing a large structured ufo craft. If you live in Texas, or the southwest please reply to this if you can provide further information of what you saw - was it simply a meteorite?

Posters comments:
Sep-14-2011 a Huge UFO craft was filmed over san antonio, texas.As I was facing west I notice this Huge glowing object traveling east.I could clearly see this object was no aircraft .No FAA navigational light's were visible.So i quickly crabbed my camcorder for a closer observation..As i began filming this huge unknown object multiply lights could be seen..This UFO appears to be a solid craft.On the video you can see this object to be emiting some kind of glowing energy.While i was filming unknown,the lights configuration began to change.When zooming in multiply lights were diff were shape... I did not see any FAA lights/hear any noise coming from this unknown object....In my opinion Clearly an UNIDENTIFED FLYING OBJECT..This was an awesome sighting due to as it appears to be One solid object..And the size of this object seemed to be enormous..This huge glowing object was clearly no aircraft or satellite.

18 comments:

Anonymous said...

I DONT SEE ANY ENERGY WAVE EMITTED FROM THIS. THAT'S JUST A LITTLE TOO MUCH "IM GONNA SELL THIS" ATTITUDE BUT IT IS DIFFERENT. i BET IT'S A PLANE. I HAVE SEEN ALL DIFFERENT KIND OF LIGHT CONFIGURATIONS ON ALL KINDS OF DIFF. PLANES.NO BLINKING LIGHTS IS KIND OF WEIRD IF IT WERE A PLANE OR HELI. LOOKS LIKE YOU GOT SOMETHING MAN-MAD ALL THE WAY THO AND i BET IT'S JUST A PLANE. I HAVE SEEN PLANES JUST TAKING OFF OR ABOUT TO LAND AND DIDN'T HAVE THEIR BLINKING LIGHTS ON AND THE LOOKS OF THIS ALTITUDE I THINK I AM RIGHT. NICE TRY THO

Anonymous said...

Either it is a meteorite,..NOT! or we're loking at the rong video:)

Michael said...

"UFO like" is an oxymoron & the 1st anonymous poster is just a moron. Not trying to troll, just saying you obviously have no idea what you're talking about. You do understand that strobe/blinking lights are required by law on any aircraft flying through the air in the US correct? If it doesn't have FAA regulation lights, it's not 1 of ours. It really is that simple. "Nice try" what? The uploader was trying to trick us? Was filming this meant to mislead people? I don't think that was his intention champ. & for God's sake; TURN OFF CAP LOCKS!

Kibby said...

To Anonymous (3:52am):

Seems you have stand up first before us. Can you elaborate by telling us what you think? Is it IFO? UFO?

The person whom filmed never said it was out of world or man-made. Is it wrong for them to say something they want to? (I believe they have the right to be excited to capture something interesting than 'orb' -- we have not seen interesting videos like that for a long time).

Anonymous said...

feikkejä vois sanoa että kaikki

Anonymous said...

So where did you send the film for analysis? Did you check radar tracking? Report to UFO sites that actually do investigations?

Randall said...

It's Morpheus in the Nebuchadnezzar. HEHE

Anonymous said...

I agree with the first poster and Michael, your an idiot. It's most likely a government plane. Regarding a strobe light being required by law doesn't mean the government has to follow that law, especially if they are working on a prototype that they want to keep secret.

Anonymous said...

A cloaked Klingon Bird of Prey

Michael said...

1st of all, you mean YOU'RE an idiot. 2nd, you can call every UFO video EVER a military test flight of some sort of experimental craft, but in actuality even the military has to follow the rules & regulations that they themselves have set in place. YOU'RE right that any1 flying anything certainly does have the option not to follow the law,I can't dispute that people make their own choices, but if this's an airplane, why don't we hear any engine noise? For what it's worth, i dismissed this video immediately due to the fact that there's no point of reference to even prove that the person filming's even pointing at the sky. He could literally be pointing at anything (lights through some trees, a reflection, something on a TV screen etc.) That makes way more sense then some kind of experimental military vehicle.

Anonymous said...

Actually this thing looks like a car to me. May be in a forest or something similar, regarding to the darkness of the environment. And the guy with the camera does all the movement.

Anonymous said...

To comment at 3.17pm:)

It would be helpful, if you would speak English..AS WELL!!
so that Michael can understand
what your saying:) Thanks!:)

aprilmae said...

michaels right...its obviously a ufo,,,cuz its hovering over,,,i saw a craft that looked exactly like this once,,,it was just floating there then blast off ,it zoomed off soooo fast,,,and when it was hovering over it was going from point to point in motions that no airplane could ...

Anonymous said...

To Michael (if you ever do read this): I wouldn't go around correcting spelling/grammer mistakes on the internet, especially on a UFO related site and ESPECIALLY when your using a word like "this's" and incorrectly using the term oxymoron.

This isn't a pissing content.

As for your question "but if this's an airplane, why don't we hear any engine noise?"
Well for one we don't know how high up the plane is and 2, who knows how quiet experimental crafts are? I live about 5 miles from an airport and see planes 24/7. I rarely hear planes unless they are low enough.

"... actuality even the military has to follow the rules & regulations"

Ummmm which military are you referring to because if your speaking of the US than you clearly must of just moved here.

Michael said...

Uhm.... NO. Sorry sweet-pea, but everything you've just said is 100% inaccurate. I use oxymoron to it's EXACT definition; calling something that's unidentified "like" anything's a perfect example of an oxymoron because something that can't be identified isn't "like" anything =) Oxymoron (according to Websters; you can take it up w/them if you'd like) "A figure of speech in which apparently contradictory terms appear in conjunction". If YOU'RE going to call some1 a moron, well you should at-least use proper grammar in doing so, because claiming some1's a moron, & then displaying ignorance in something as simple as 5th grade grammar is, well... MORONIC =P As for "this's"; it's usage is disputed (but commonly accepted) depending on how critical you are of the guidelines (I don't feel they're set in stone as long as it's usage is logically viable). Don't worry, the smartest person in the room's always the person that gets the most scrutiny for his opinion. I'll consider this endearing to say the least =p

Anonymous said...

Ahh yes. I was waiting for your mature rebuttal. And as I originally thought, you are 14.

I like how you condemn me for using "your" and not "you're" but you say "this's" is commonly accepted. This just shows what a half-wit you are. "This's" is not proper nor accepted, simple as that. Make sure you pay attention this year in high school.

And "btw", I called you a moron because you had the sack to call someone an idiot for no good reason.

Michael said...

Oh there was good reason; any1 who types a whole paragraph in caps is a moron. & who are you quoting w/those quotes around btw?

Anonymous said...

I believe this is a legitimate video but of meteors burning up as they enter the atmosphere. They are probably of a unique or interesting composition that caused them to burn up very quickly and brilliantly. We are a bit mislead by the "fluidic" appearance of the event and the fact that it is allegedly happening in a single spot, implying hovering. In fact, the fragments are burning up in more or less one spot in a continuous wave. Very beautiful event, but I believe that this is the most likely explanation. --Elenchus