But a new experiment has confirmed the existence of 114, which Means a little bit more of Lazar's story is based in fact . (Note: many things about Lazar still don't match up like his eduction , and i have always doubted his claims as not trustworthy, with truth and false mixed together -plus its troublesome that his website and story maybe motivated by the chance to turn this all into a big movie.)
Eitherway would like your comments about this new development:
Published: Sept. 29, 2009 at 10:20 AM Order reprints BERKELEY, Calif., Sept. 29 (UPI) -- U.S. scientists say they have confirmed the production of the superheavy element 114, 10 years after a Russian group first claimed to have made it. The researchers at the U.S. Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, led by University of California-Berkeley Professor Heino Nitsche and and Berekely Lab senior staff scientist Ken Gregorich, independently confirmed the production of the new element, which was first published by the Dubna Gas Filled Recoil Separator group. Using an instrument called the Berkeley Gas-filled Separator at Berkeley Lab's 88-Inch Cyclotron, the researchers said they were able to confirm the creation of two individual nuclei of element 114, each a separate isotope having 114 protons, but a different numbers of neutrons, and each decaying by a separate pathway. "By verifying the production of element 114, we have removed any doubts about the validity of the Dubna group's claims," Nitsche said. "This proves that the most interesting superheavy elements can in fact be made in the laboratory." The verification of element 114 is reported in the journal Physical Review Letters.
Interesting Video - anti gravity and how Ufos my Fly:
Posts
5 comments:
It's amazing to see, how Bob Lizard's nonsensial claims are colported over and over again and produce false hopes - just due to the widespread scientific illiterism: Nobody have ever denied the existence of superheavy elements, and, there is an island of stability around Element 114...116. However, the term 'stable' is relative. We talk about half-times of minutes - and not millions of years, that were required to use such elements as a fuel. Further, Lizard attributes magical properties to these elements (antimatter-decay, aka beta+ decay line, gravity wave generation, etc.) that are simply wrong. Correct is, super-heavy elements follow the well known thorium- and uranium-decay lines, are difficult to create, and they do not live long enough for any useful application. That's not an empty claim, since all possible elements above iron are created in supernovea. Hence we could find stable isotopes just here on earth, if such a thing existed. The same statement applies to the shown video: It is made up by a self-proclaimed wannabe-scientist, who put together all claims and real physics to a fantastic construction.
Can you please post an official link from one of the tops scientific news sites about this article?
Also can you please post a link to the article from the Berekely Lab.
Many thanks
ufo hunters episodes now on youtube
UFO hunters: the Silencers http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sO2eupkFpZU
Ufo hunters: dark presence http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhSvShHxxkU
Ufo hunters: Area 52 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOAKD0yMTnQ
Ufo hunters: first response http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwhGgTAecvo
All parts can be found in the column box on the right hand side of this link: http://www.youtube.com/user/integrajoey#p/u
The author of www.antigravity.it has written an excellent article. You have made your point and there is not much to argue about. It is like the following universal truth that you can not argue with: The best truths invariably come from the sides of mugs that you never remember purchasing. Thanks for the info.
I want to thank the blogger very much not only for this post but also for his all previous efforts. I found www.antigravity.it to be extremely interesting. I will be coming back to www.antigravity.it for more information.
Post a Comment