NASA Airbrushed bases on the Moon:
The famous 1997 Phoenix Lights:
The Rendlesham Forest UK 1980 Ufo Landing:
The famous 1990 Belgium Triangle Ufo
Roswell 1947 and Why it was real:
Ufos over the whitehouse 1952 :
.jpg)
RealUfos recommends :
UFO Hunters Season 2
Know a good Book or DVD? emailme
Skin Design:
Blogs Gone Wild!
Guys,
This new hypersonic plane in the Us may explain some recent triangular ufo sightings. Is this the mysterious Aurora? It brings to question are the government basing the design of new planes on Ufos? Is the result of 50 yrs of back-engineering slowly making its way into the design on new planes?
Updated Daily
World's No.1 site for UFO News
(as ranked by google)
All you need to know
on Ufos - in one spot
Ufos -
'The Biggest story of the Millenium'
Read the latest Ufo news
Browse through archives,
Educate with documentaries
Our Readers Ufo Videos & Photos
Keep Your Eyes to the Skies!
Please Help RealUfos:
Check this Youtube link daily for new ufo videos & submit 'hot' ones with the links for me to feature
Upload your Ufo Photos & video
Subscribe to RealUfos:
Posts
+copy.jpg)
RSS Feed (xml)
9 comments:
Doesn't look like it could do much of the stuff that we see observed in all these recent vids, much less anything to do with Phoenix. But it could explain a lot I suppose... Interesting! one more thing to look out for!
Cool. But triangular UFOs can
silently fly and hoover. Can this
jets do that?
Its a JET airplane. J E T = invented by mankind, perfected by mankind, flied by mankind. DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
Yea this really does not explain anything. People might have spotted but think logically. This thing can sit still and change directions in the blink of an eye. Not only that, but most of the triangular ships have been spotted at night. Now why would the government or NASA regulate night based test flights on a beta craft design? Wouldn't you want some light on you if something were to happen.
Correction, I meant this thing "CAN'T" sit still and change directions in the blink of an eye.
I've seen this before. What I find amusing is that they're only showing computer simulations of various "looks" of what a hypersonic craft might be like.
There is so little substance to the interview as well. It's so casual. Feels a little fake to have some guy jump in and say "Oh, btw we're working on planes that go faster." Yeah, we imagine you would since that's what people do.. trying to go faster/higher, but tell us about it when it's developed and you have a 1 hour discovery channel special on it. The guys describing it sucked. He explained it so ambiguously and was VERY inarticulate.
Inarticulate IS the word. Watching the guy describe it was like watching paint dry.
It doesn't have to explain anything it's just interesting GOOD POST
I dont think it has anything to do with the triangles but still Very cool, thanx!!
Post a Comment