Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Finding NASA's airbushed moon towers using Military's own site

Hey guys,
I did a post on this ages ago on this but thought i would bring up again for all the newbie's who has since joined my website. As crazy as it sounds its well known that NASA has airbrushed towers and structures from the moon. Its clearly obvious that these towers and structures exist after to you view the images yourself from the US militarys own website (see below):

Finding The Moon Base - Click here for the funniest movie of the week

Below you will see images with huge, alien structures that have been photographically “smudged” to hide the structure or structures from the militay's own website. Please right click and “save image as” to keep the images and open them in a program for zooming in and closer inspection:

This first image shows a rectangular alien structure looking straight down on it. In the image, the structure is small but in scale, it is HUGE! Here it is:
[click here]

This second image shows two very tall tower structures that have been censored and “smudged”. Based on the size and shape of the “smudges”, these alien structures are over a mile high! Here it is:
[click here]

This third image shows another absolutely massive alien structure that has been censored and “smudged”. Here it is:
[click here]

This fourth image shows a structured that has been censored and “smudged” but parts of the structure can be seen poking out…

To access this image, it will take steps:
First, go to the following site:
http://www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil/clementine/clib/
Now here are the settings:
Desired Resolution: 1 pixel = 1 kilometer
- Image Size = 768x768
- Latitude = -70 (as in minus 70)
- Longitude = 137 Leave everything else alone and click the “Use lat/long” button.

This fifth image is one that shows three very tall structures towards the bottom of the image that have been censored and “smudged [click here]

38 comments:

Anonymous said...

I used fireworks 8 to watch the photos.I applied a filter" search for the edges "and the result is very clear.The area airbrushed appear completly black while the rest is normaly pixelised.
The airbrushing is evident.
The areas airbrushed are huge ,tens or hundreds of km.
Why this coverup?why this silence?
E T bases are the only response.

Anonymous said...

Problem: The "rectangle" in photo one is in Mare Fecunditatis and to the right of the lunar craters named Messier and Messier A. Though taken from space it is not a particularly high magnification image. You can look at that region with with a backyard telescope and should be able to see that recangle if it existed. It doesn't.

http://www.seds.org/MESSIER/xtra/m-crater.html

Anonymous said...

if nasa was hiding something as serious as alien bases then they would not even give you a photo to look at.

Anonymous said...

it's probably just aliens.....
dumb arse... geez R-tard

Anonymous said...

http://www.google.com/moon/
Search for Messier Crater
There is no smudge there. bummer.

Anonymous said...

lmao you lot!!! you would be able to make them out from earth with a decent telescope :)

greylion said...

Who says these have to be structures(buildings)?
If some instead are/were landed spaceships, they need not be there anymore.
Anyway, even if they were non-spacegoing structures, the military has had 35+ years to remove them.

Anonymous said...

Maybe your the loser buddy!

Anonymous said...

I say we all take over the world and I become king, and get to choose any girl I like and..........

Anonymous said...

You can't view them from earth with a telescope because the moon doesn't rotate and these structures are on the dark side of the moon.

Zooty said...

I think it's kind of silly, a lot of these pictures, especially the 'towers' ones, extend the whole screen, which makes me believe its a pixelation issue with the camera/imaging than a hidden tower.. As much as I'd love something to be there, your 'proof' gets me no closer to the truth..

Anonymous said...

Searched on Google Moon... no pixelation... Must have been an error in the Clemintine imagery. Myth Busted!

Shol'va said...

Nobody ever 'airbrushed out' something in planetary images. That's an invention of our every busy, multi-billion UFO/conspiracytainment industry, where Steven Greer's self-proclaimed 'high ranking officials' are a part of this puzzle. Correct is, in the Clementine data stream, there are gaps and erronous data. If an alternative source could be found, US Navy (the operator of the Clementine database) completed the missing data from lower resolved data. UFO crazies, not familiar with digital image processing believe, these blurry patches must be cover-up works. Fact is, on the Clementine website, there is a readme-page, that explains this policy in full lenghts. Just another inconvenient truth, snake-oil sellers don't want to know you.

Anonymous said...

just because them images have errors doesn't mean it's a cover up.

Anonymous said...

if its on the dark side of the moon you would see it however, I have a very large telescope and never seen anything on the visable side of the moon, not saying there is no life out there, but there should be some proof of it. bases on the moon good story. Walter

Deni said...

If there are buildings on the moon it wouldn't take only people from the united ststes to descover them after all the russians were there before us anyway and what pictures have they taken? A lot! Get serious people and start using your head and not your childhood amagination.

Scarey Gary said...

The moon DOES rotate, and it DOES NOT have a 'dark side'.

Anonymous said...

Actually the truth is nearer the middle. Not the best source, but it is explained fairly well:

..."Two sides of the Moon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon

The Moon is in synchronous rotation, which means it rotates about its axis in about the same time it takes to orbit the Earth. This results in it keeping nearly the same face turned towards the Earth at all times. The Moon used to rotate at a faster rate, but early in its history, its rotation slowed and became locked in this orientation as a result of frictional effects associated with tidal deformations caused by the Earth.[12]..."

Anonymous said...

I know images have been airbrushed out...and for good reason...they don't want you to know and if you listen to some of the silly arguments on here you never will. Another thing...and i quote:

"Searched on Google Moon... no pixelation... Must have been an error in the Clemintine imagery. Myth Busted!"

Where does google moon get its images from? Yep...nassa.
There you go, with silly conclusions like this its no wonder people never learn anything because they're too willing to accept silly answers like thois one.
To know the truth you need to open your eyes and not accept the first sceptical answer that comes along.

Anonymous said...

I know images have been airbrushed out...and for good reason...they don't want you to know and if you listen to some of the silly arguments on here you never will. Another thing...and i quote:

"Searched on Google Moon... no pixelation... Must have been an error in the Clemintine imagery. Myth Busted!"

Where does google moon get its images from? Yep...nassa.
There you go, with silly conclusions like this its no wonder people never learn anything because they're too willing to accept silly answers like thois one.
To know the truth you need to open your eyes and not accept the first sceptical answer that comes along.

Anonymous said...

It's a Soviet rubbish dump... if you squint you can see it.

Anonymous said...

Ok so first off, it is quite impossible to see structures on the side of the moon the structures are located with ANY telescope. Why? Well because they're on the dark side of the moon, and the dark side of the moon NEVER faces the sun or our line of sight. We only ever see one side of the moon. The other side is permanently obscured from view and that is where the airbrushed pictures are located. The fact remains that multiple NASA personell including astronauts who walked on the moon(buzz aldrin) claim that NASA is responsible for covering up the existence of UFO's. There are NASA employees that are willing to testify before congress about the reality of coverups airbrushing, and UFO sightings from the very first American in space. Actually their have been sightings from the very first person in space. The first two russian cosmonauts who ever breached the atmosphere and entered Earth's orbit were recorded saying that their was a huge and frightening object approaching their space capsule and that if they did not make it back, "the world will never know of this." well guess what? They never made it back. My point is that it's pretty obvious something is up there on the moon that we can't see because it's located on the darkside of the lunar surface. I sincerely doubt that anyone is going to put their career on the line by making false claims of lunar bases and airbrushed photographs and the coverup they're employed to assist.

species-521 said...

@anonymous @9:03
what? there's a dark side of the moon, that never faces the sun...what??
the first two russian... WHAT?
where do YOU get THAT from? no, don't tell... nevermind... not important...

species-521 said...

@anonymous @9:03 AM
what? there's a dark side of the moon, that never faces the sun...what?
the first two russian cosmonauts...WHAT?
where do YOU get THAT knoledgement from?
oh nevermind, don't tell.... just forget it...

Anonymous said...

This is so fucking ridiculous.

First off, it is basing these claims off images from the Clementine Mission, which was FOURTEEN YEARS AGO!!

Clementine launched in 1994!!

Wake up people, if you want the truth, just go to http://MOON.GOOGLE.COM and go ZOOM IN on the exact spot in these pictures. Image #1 is right next to tje two Craters, Messier and Messier A at 1.9°S 47.6°E.

You'll see, quite clearly in modern, high resolution images that the moon is, in fact, quite barren and lifeless!

You can also see excellent images of those two craters on Wikipedia; at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messier_crater

Stop sippin this idiots koolaid.

Anonymous said...

Go to youtube and type william cooper exposes the illuminati and watch. Then type in steven greer exopolitics sept 2009 barcelona and watch. Then type in zeitgeist orientation and watch. And finally type in leonard horowitz and medicine wolf inteview and watch. Pls enjoy and disscus. Happy viewing.
Peace and unification, just get along we are 1.

Anonymous said...

Just open your mind for one moment. It would be narrow minded and egotistical to asume that we are the only civilization to inhabit the grand vastness of this endless universe. Just look around you here on the earth, underwater, in the sky, you have another forms of life that evolve differently to us. Remember communication isnt just words it done in so many ways. freqency, wave, vibration, and many many other ways that would leave you mouth wide open. We have been communicating and negotiating with multi civilizations for centuries. Explore and wisen up ladies and gentlemen.love and light peace out.

Anonymous said...

None of this imagery shows anything at all convincing. Very large areas of the images look just as smudged and airbrushed as the supposed 'buildings'. In no way can any of these photographs be considered evidence of anything. They are basically poor quality, low resolution images of the moons surface, captured with insufficient detail to determine anything like what is being contended here.

henrivies said...

Funny enough i had a long browse on the map and saw what looks to be a vessel stationary behind/in the shadow of one of the cliff. it's slightly to the right of the map.
Seriousy! have look and you'll see it.

mitra nou 1 said...

I spotted something that looks like a vessel hiding behind the shadow of one of the many cliffs. It is slightly sticking out of the shadow and you can see the shape and contour quite clearly.
Check it out for yourself.

This is the coordinates where the vessel is.
it's in the shadow and sticking out slightly. You can see that it an ellipticle shape with a dome on the top and two smaller disc at the bottom.
What do you think? Could it be?

Scale:1 pixel = 200meters

Latitude :77 º 38 '
Longitude: 124 º 30 '

Anonymous said...

I spotted something that looks like a vessel hiding behind the shadow of one of the many cliffs. It is slightly sticking out of the shadow and you can see the shape and contour quite clearly.
Check it out for yourself.

This is the coordinates where the vessel is.
it's in the shadow and sticking out slightly. You can see that it's an ellipticle shape with a dome on the top and two smaller disc at the bottom.
What do you think? Could it be?

Scale:1 pixel = 200meters

Latitude :77 º 38 '
Longitude: 124 º 30 '

Anonymous said...

I spotted something that looks like a vessel hiding behind the shadow of one of the many cliffs. It is slightly sticking out of the shadow and you can see the shape and contour quite clearly.
Check it out for yourself.

This is the coordinates where the vessel is.
it's in the shadow and sticking out slightly. You can see that it's an ellipticle shape with a dome on the top and two smaller disc at the bottom.
What do you think? Could it be?

Scale:1 pixel = 200meters

Latitude :77 º 38 '
Longitude: 124 º 30 '

Anonymous said...

The black spots are caused by the imaging system going off line. The main computer eventually malfunctioned, causing the spacecraft to expend all it's fuel and spin out of control.

The main computer would have controlled the imaging systems and everything else. It obviously started having glitches in the programming, or there was a hardware glitch, which accounts for the black spots.

Anonymous said...

I saw the original photos on the front page of the Oregon journal at the time of the original curcum. our scientists. said at the time.not possible to be natural.naviga published these photos on front pageion. every newspaper in the modern world. scientists not conspiracy theorists. 3 very very tall towers too steep to be natural formations given the gravity of the moon. everyone that read the paper saw these photos. in days all discussion stopped. true

Anonymous said...

Not facing us back side

Anonymous said...

what don't you get about its on the dark side of the moon people? Those of you that claim you can see it with your telescope are just plain retarded. Seriously, research into this and you can plainly see that NASA has been covering up this type of evidence for years! Numerous astronauts have already came forward and told their story's. Do you really just google something and believe what google might tell you? You can google maps the Area 51 base too, yet most of it is either blurred out or blacked out. hmmm wonder why. I mean damn....do your fuckin research before getting into this type of discussion.

DoggyPositionGal said...

I went to the links given and all I can find is the home page...no images are linked.

I want to ask if it is FACT that images taken of the surface of the moon are doctored in some way in order to conceal something that is there ? ..I have no faith in government or their departments at all but find it hard to believe that their efforts at concealing alien buildings etc would be so amateur..surely they would make a much better job of airbrushing/pixelating/hiding these "anomalies" ?

Mike Delahunt said...
This comment has been removed by the author.